The first annual Goddess Spirit Rising Conference, an international retreat on the Pacific, will be held in Malibu, CA on September 6, 7 & 8, 2013. If like me, you’ve been hoping for a spiritual and educational conference in Southern California, please come out and help make this amazing conference a great success!
There will be three amazing days of workshops, ceremony and wisdom, with world-renowned presenters, plus artists, musicians, vendors, readers and healers This is the first of it’s kind in Southern California Let’s participate and be sure it’s not the last!
In the words of the organizers, Anique Radiant Heart and Laura and Duffy of the Hands of Demeter.....
As reflections of Her divinity, we invite you to be part of the celebration of Her and the creation of a vision for a world that reflects Her more closely. We seek to honor our diversity, the beauty of Her children and our collective contributions to a world built on community, mutuality and reverence for She Who Is All.
Some of the international presenters include Anique Radiant Heart, Jane Hardwicke Collings and Bilawara from Australia, Kathy and Mike Jones from England and Sandra Roman who hails from Spain and South America.
Some but not all U.S. presenters include Joan Marler, Lydia Ruyle, Judy Piazza, Susan Weed, Christina Biaggi, Z Budapest, Ruth Barrett, Falcon River, Vicki Noble. Max Dashu, Amy Peck, Valerie Eagle Hart and yours truly, Karen Tate. I'll be giving a fun and participatory talk called, Finding Your Sacred Roar!
For more information and to register, please visit the official website at www.GoddessSpiritRising.com
Discussion about sex, power, politics, and religion - All the things Mom said we must never discuss at the dinner table!
Tuesday, April 30, 2013
Tuesday, April 9, 2013
Margaret Thatcher is No Heroine - Rather, Patriarchy in a Skirt
This week you are no doubt hearing everywhere about how Margaret
Thatcher is the pride of England. How as a woman she rose to heights no
one imagined might be possible. Starting out the daughter of a shop
keeper, living over their store, she fought through the ranks to become
Prime Minister of England for over a decade. And of course we are all
sorry for her passing and offer our respects as we would with most
anyone that passes on. However, let us examine her legacy and what her
leadership actually meant to the people of England.
I’d invite you to check in with your friends in England. See if they’re mourning her passing or if like my friends across the pond, they more likely remember the suffering she caused them. A Conservative and friend of former President Ronald Reagan, she was responsible, as was he, for beginning to unravel the social safety net in their countries. She believed there is no “society” there are only individuals. Sound familiar? The Ayn Rand - Paul Ryan - Tea Party “rugged individualism” mantra that would have half the country living under a bridge, Social Security cut below a living wage and Medicare a voucher program that would buy nothing. Oh - and let's not forget, all the benefits of our tax dollars helping the 1% and corporations!
Pull up the old videos. They’re available on the internet. See the riots in the streets that occurred when she went after labor and working class people. She was also anti-gay and on the wrong side of history. She and Reagan ushered in a tone of “greed is good” rather than the idea leaders are in office to see to the common good and general welfare of the people. She, like Reagan, was for corporate power, not the welfare of the workers, though both may have couched their language to dupe the public into thinking the changes they were instituting were actually good for them. The truth is the result of their leadership has led us here in the United States and in England to being two countries with the largest income disparity among it’s people - which adversely affects women and children most severely. Margaret Thatcher eventually paid the price for her desire for more austerity and privatization. Her own party threw her out of office because the people were in revolt.
So when you remember Margaret Thatcher, and you hear how she was a pioneer for women, well, that might be, in a sense. But would you want Sarah Palin or Michele Bachman leading the country simply because we share the same genitalia? Of course not. It’s the policies of a politician we care about. We care about how their beliefs affect society and culture and real people's lives. Are their policies selfish or immoral? Do they care about everyone or just a select few? Do they believe greed is good and anyone not rich, well, maybe they’re just lazy and don’t work hard enough so they turn a blind eye to the struggle and suffering rather than understand playing field is not level and we all do better when all our boats float.
Margaret Thatcher would probably be right at home with Right Wing Conservatives and Tea Party folks. I can see her tipping a cup with Mitt Romney, Rush Limbaugh and Paul Ryan. No wonder she despised liberals, who truly are on the side of people, workers, women and the common good.
I’d invite you to check in with your friends in England. See if they’re mourning her passing or if like my friends across the pond, they more likely remember the suffering she caused them. A Conservative and friend of former President Ronald Reagan, she was responsible, as was he, for beginning to unravel the social safety net in their countries. She believed there is no “society” there are only individuals. Sound familiar? The Ayn Rand - Paul Ryan - Tea Party “rugged individualism” mantra that would have half the country living under a bridge, Social Security cut below a living wage and Medicare a voucher program that would buy nothing. Oh - and let's not forget, all the benefits of our tax dollars helping the 1% and corporations!
Pull up the old videos. They’re available on the internet. See the riots in the streets that occurred when she went after labor and working class people. She was also anti-gay and on the wrong side of history. She and Reagan ushered in a tone of “greed is good” rather than the idea leaders are in office to see to the common good and general welfare of the people. She, like Reagan, was for corporate power, not the welfare of the workers, though both may have couched their language to dupe the public into thinking the changes they were instituting were actually good for them. The truth is the result of their leadership has led us here in the United States and in England to being two countries with the largest income disparity among it’s people - which adversely affects women and children most severely. Margaret Thatcher eventually paid the price for her desire for more austerity and privatization. Her own party threw her out of office because the people were in revolt.
So when you remember Margaret Thatcher, and you hear how she was a pioneer for women, well, that might be, in a sense. But would you want Sarah Palin or Michele Bachman leading the country simply because we share the same genitalia? Of course not. It’s the policies of a politician we care about. We care about how their beliefs affect society and culture and real people's lives. Are their policies selfish or immoral? Do they care about everyone or just a select few? Do they believe greed is good and anyone not rich, well, maybe they’re just lazy and don’t work hard enough so they turn a blind eye to the struggle and suffering rather than understand playing field is not level and we all do better when all our boats float.
Margaret Thatcher would probably be right at home with Right Wing Conservatives and Tea Party folks. I can see her tipping a cup with Mitt Romney, Rush Limbaugh and Paul Ryan. No wonder she despised liberals, who truly are on the side of people, workers, women and the common good.
Sunday, March 31, 2013
20 Sins & Inhumanities Against Women Today
Before we say good-bye to Women's History Month and welcome in Spring and new beginnings, it's important to shed light on what is, what needs to change, so that we might re-imagine what might be new in the world, so that we might manifest it and no longer accept the old as the norm. Yes, today, women around the world still suffer these inhumane conditions mentioned below. We think we are so evolved, advanced, so sophisticated. Well, look again. Things look pretty somber if you're the female gender around the world. What are you doing to re-write the next chapter for women on Mother Earth?
20 Sins and Inhumanities Against Women
1. Domestic violence and sexual abuse
2. Female genital mutilation (FGM)
3. Seventy percent of women retire in poverty
4. Women's leadership is thwarted, including within religious institutions. While being the majority, there is less than 20% representation by women in the U. S. Congress, corporate America and academia. Many religions ignore a woman's spiritual calling to be ordained .
5. Women and children are at the margins of societies the world over suffering from the worst health care, education and human rights.
6. White women are paid only 74 cents on the dollar, compared to men, and less if they are Hispanic or Black.
7. Bride burning and arranged marriages still exist.
8. Women may be shunned from families or seen to bring shame to their family if they have been raped or believed to have committed adultry. Tragic consequences for them can include being stoned to death.
9. Distorted view of women and sexuality resulting in obsessive and unhealthy pornography industry
10. Women are being duped by "New Feminism" that encourages submissiveness and dependence
11. Human trafficking, aka slavery and forced prostitution
12. Teaching women grounds for divorce might be abandonment or adultry but not abuse
13. Boy children are valued while female babies are still killed at birth in poor countries because they may cost the family an expensive marriage dowry later in life.
14. Sexuality is dirty and unclean and by association, so too are women, menstruation and female reproduction
15. Women are still in danger of losing their reproductive rights.
16. A distorted view of beauty has millions of women with eating disorders and flocking to cosmetic surgeons.
17. Women and attributes equated with the feminine consciousness, are seen as inferior to men with far reaching consequences for both genders.
18. Rape is used as a weapon of war.
19. Programming of women to perpetuate this list of sins rather than encouraging self-empowerment and a climate where women support women.
20. As we have forgotten the value in the belief of the interconnectedness of all things, so too have we diminished the role of women as life-givers in the natural order of the universe.
Friday, March 15, 2013
Defining "Herstory" for Women's History Month
Welcome friends, fans and colleagues to my new blog! No better time to start it than Women's History Month! I hope you'll subscribe and keep on top of all the "bees buzzing in my bonnet" as well as my radio show guests, appearances, classes, projects and women's issues across the globe! And tell your friends about Herstory with Karen Tate!
You've no doubt heard scholars during Women's History Month lament the dearth of information out there on women over the years. Of course, there are some famous names we all recognize. Most people might hear about Cleopatra, Queen Elizabeth, Esther of the Bible, Gloria Steinem, Hildegard von Bingen, Oprah Winfrey and Margaret Thatcher, but let's face it. History is written by the conquerors, not the gender that has been oppressed by patriarchy for thousands of years.
In some countries women are lucky to be able to go to school, even in 2013. They may be traded for livestock or have acid thrown on their faces for disobeying male authority. They may even be forced to marry their rapist. Certainly we have been doing a lot of work without equal pay. Statistics show we actually do 80% of the labor but only own 20% of the world's assets. Men are still trying to tell us what to do with our bodies and we're called FemiNazis if we want equality. Here in the United States we do not have equal pay for equal work and some men are talking about what is or is not "legitimate rape", telling us to put an aspirin between our knees to avoid pregnancy or suggest our employers should have a say in if we have access to contraception. States across the country are actually denying women to their constitutional right to abortions. No wonder it is the moral imperative of our time to empower women across the globe!
So maybe one small way to start doing that is by embracing a somewhat new definition within the English language: Herstory. Here's my definition first published in my book, Sacred Places of Goddess: 108 Destinations.
Herstory.....Viewing what has come before through the lens of a female or woman’s perspective. No longer just considered a term of the feminist, society at large is beginning to understand what has transpired for the past thousands of years has been written, interpreted and told from a male-centered, patriarchal point of view, called his-story. Herstory is the other half of the equation, the missing pieces of the puzzle, told from the other gender. The threads of this rich tapestry of life had been stifled or obliterated by those who sought power and control, thereby subjugating and diminishing the female gender’s participation in the vast timeline of civilization. Herstory includes the richness of women’s roles in the past, including their art, traditions, culture, and the often excluded feminine face of deity. Undervalued in the past, women and men are coming into wholeness as they discover what had been obscured and swept under the sands of time.
Howard Zinn (August 24, 1922 – January 27, 2010) was an American academic historian, author, playwright, and social activist. Before and during his tenure as a political science professor at Boston University from 1964-88 he wrote more than 20 books, which included his best-selling and influential A People's History of the United States.
Howard does speak about some of the unsung heroines of history in the United States, but I think it's about time we coined a phrase for achievements of women of the past, present and future. We have to recognize we have been seeing the world only through the eyes of men and as one of my colleagues, author, Tim Ward, says, until we see the world through the lens of the Feminine, we are all only looking through one eye.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)